Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 5 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$345
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.5% Average
1-Core 66
2-Core 131
46% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 352
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 356
24% 356 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 58.4
16% 59.4 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 51.1
18% 56.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 73 98 38 114 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 119
Write 101
Mixed 104
SusWrite 71.1
22% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 21
78% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 27.7
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
116GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 55 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 56.2
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 62%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
292GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 53
Mixed 46
SusWrite 56.1
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 50%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
144GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 84 87 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87
Write 85.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 85.4
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 2,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $827
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback