Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 02:47
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 121 56% 89.1 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 318 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.9 33% 36.7 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 37.5 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 136 127 119 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 358 Write 125 Mixed 198 SusWrite 127 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 23 80% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 77.9 DQ Mixed 90 74% 107 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 111 113 111 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 111 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 164 165 162 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 133 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 161 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 180 182 182 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 167 Mixed 38 SusWrite 181 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 59GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 127 129 128 128 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 159 Write 166 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 127 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 107%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5TB free Firmware: RT18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 172 170 172 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 88 Write 87.8 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 170 68% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.7 268% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 769GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 136 137 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 140 Write 128 Mixed 20 SusWrite 136 137% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.8 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16