Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	RAZER RAZER
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140728
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '19 at 00:57
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4702HQ 3,582 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 38.3 29% 39.7 Pts	4-Core 95.8 8-Core 139 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Intel(8086 0416) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4414 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 3.5 2% 3 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000SO 512GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT2200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 50 50 43 42 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 301 Write 77.2 Mixed 127 SusWrite 52 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 18.1 67% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 74.8 65% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7.2 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,057x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,443x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,751x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16