Sapphire PW-CI7B75M-VA

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Sapphire PW-CI7B75M-VA (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20130320
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '19 at 19:49
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 91.1 2-Core 177 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 431 46% 366 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59% Above average	Lighting 73.7 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 66.8 60% 71.1 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 68.8 Splatting 68.9 57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: M206 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 344 Write 263 Mixed 230 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 27.7 96% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 108 125% 219 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 95%
ACASIS 256GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 28GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 142 162 154 142 152 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.2% Average	Read 239 Write 191 Mixed 238 SusWrite 152 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 16.7 58% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 123 91% 119 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 86%
Hitachi HTE545050A7E380 500GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 307GB free Firmware: GG2OAD80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 74 73 69 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 62 Write 64 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 70.6 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB 2,433 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 9GB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 74 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 62.3 Write 64.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 71.6 39% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 320GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 54GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 50 51 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 47.7 Write 39.8 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 50.3 59% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 37%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 43GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 100 98 98 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 112 Write 101 Mixed 32 SusWrite 97.9 111% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%
Mass Storage Device 64GB 1,817 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 24GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 17 17 16 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	9.58% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 16.1 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 85% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.58% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04CB 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16