Samsung R710

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung R710 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R710
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 54.5 37% 52 Pts	4-Core 54.4 8-Core 54.6 7% 54.5 Pts	64-Core 55.6 3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT 3,959 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C520) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56 3,862 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 15 10 3.6 12 12 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 152 Write 4.3 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 9 10% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 5.3 28% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45 4,619 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 44GB free Firmware: FB4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 41 41 40 39 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 41.8 Write 41 Mixed 22 SusWrite 40.9 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R710 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R710

CPU
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P7350Intel $43Bench 35%, 2,717 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	4x
GeForce 9300M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,044 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16