MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 12:02
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,023
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,403
87% 1,403 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 39.8
37% 43.3 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 36.2
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 107 104 106 105 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 486
Write 250
Mixed 345
SusWrite 152
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 40.6
158% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 203
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
240GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 192 196 328 194 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 86.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 242
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 9.5
31% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 9.6
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 9.4
8% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 102%
Kingdian S200 60GB
52GB free
Firmware: Q1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 296 296 296 298 240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 514
Write 291
Mixed 342
SusWrite 287
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 22.8
142% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 26.5
71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
808GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 164 164 165 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 134
Mixed 84
SusWrite 163
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
778GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 75 78 75 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 76.4
97% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3133 MHz clocked @ 1567 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback