Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon L5420-$130 1,165 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 71.6 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 142 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3000JS-60PDB0 300GB 1,177 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21.00M21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 55 51 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 54.9 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 53.6 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 34%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 13GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 18.4 Write 11.8 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 12.4 18% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 3.2 239% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	3x
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	1x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	3x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	3x
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	1x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $75

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16