Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive437% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 1,007
89% 754 Pts
64-Core 2,733
169% 2,733 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 119
Parallax 122
101% 121 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 120
Splatting 97.5
103% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1891 1888 1844 1902 1899 1867 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 2,260
Write 1,909
Mixed 2,072
SusWrite 1,882
457% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 192
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 176
605% 179 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 963
728% 979 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 437%
Great: 559%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
215GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 2055 2064 2067 2064 2047 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,399
Write 1,966
Mixed 946
SusWrite 2,059
412% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 69.3
240% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,109
DQ Write 1005
DQ Mixed 969
751% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 343%
Great: 353%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 310 310 311 310 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 397
Write 386
Mixed 360
SusWrite 321
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 26.9
88% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 121
91% 123 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB
164GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 32.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 35.8
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 1.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 13.6
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.7
154% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$143
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 77.1
MC Mixed 72.6
215% 75.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 188%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,479
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback