Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 144%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 15:49
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$450
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
85% 180 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 960
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 2,713
182% 2,713 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Gigabyte(1458 37CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
15% 59.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 59.7
18% 59.7 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$255
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1885 1898 1896 1779 1728 1730 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,256
Write 1,902
Mixed 2,072
SusWrite 1,819
453% 2,012 MB/s
4K Read 190
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 174
600% 177 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 950
720% 969 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 431%
Great: 569%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
215GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2051 2055 2061 2063 2063 2047 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,391
Write 1,965
Mixed 926
SusWrite 2,057
411% 1,835 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 69.2
239% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 1,003
DQ Mixed 975
753% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 342%
Great: 359%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 311 309 309 309 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 397
Write 397
Mixed 365
SusWrite 320
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 27.1
89% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 113
91% 126 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 78%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB
164GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 32.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 35.4
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 13.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.7
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.4
140% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$332
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 75.6
MC Mixed 73.4
214% 74.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 187%
Great: 153%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140AMD RX 580 $169Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX Vega 56 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback