Asus 1015PE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus 1015PE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015PE
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 4.3
2-Core 8.7
13% 15.1 Pts
4-Core 13.9
8-Core 14.3
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 13.9
1% 13.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 60 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 65.1
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 62.6
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
8GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 10 4.3 3.3 7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.5
Write 19.5
SusWrite 5.6
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
33% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 0.1
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback