Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 144% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '19 at 06:44
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 257 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 781 78% 636 Pts	64-Core 948 59% 948 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 230 Parallax 251 166% 228 fps	MRender 251 Gravity 215 Splatting 153 163% 206 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 50 51 63 75 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 675GB free Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 668 645 688 756 685 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,373 Write 1,243 Mixed 1,071 SusWrite 770 250% 1,114 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 80.2 266% 95.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,025 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 520 508% 809 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 372%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 741GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 67 67 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 96 Write 93 Mixed 75 SusWrite 67.3 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB 4,019 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 49.6 MC Write 44.3 MC Mixed 41.3 129% 45.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 22.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 53 75% 53 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	694x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	194x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	213x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	180x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $891

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16