Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 196
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 542
55% 448 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 8.09
5% 38.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 14.8
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 102
Parallax 84.7
71% 91.5 fps
MRender 89.5
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 84.2
70% 85.9 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2116 2227 2165 1923 2016 1844 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,111
Write 2,199
Mixed 1,096
SusWrite 2,049
367% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65.9
214% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 888
661% 875 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 275%
Great: 425%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 33 32 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 36.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 33.4
44% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback