Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 111 53% 83.6 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 347 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 80.3 Parallax 68.4 61% 74.3 fps	MRender 73.6 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 77.7 61% 74 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 46 50 123 30 52 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.1% Poor	Read 186 Write 85.5 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 70.1 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 10.3 42% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14.2 11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 269GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 134 143 144 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 140 Write 123 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 140 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 16.3 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $100

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	268x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	184x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	134x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	23x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	199x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	186x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16