Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 108
56% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 225
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 11.8
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.7
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 133 164 136 67 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 377
Write 366
Mixed 272
SusWrite 150
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 38.9
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 119
102% 153 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
165GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 64 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 96.3
Write 90.2
Mixed 59
SusWrite 64.3
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 69%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
32GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 45 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 39.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 44.6
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 57%
WDC WD50 00LPVT-22G33T0 500GB
323GB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 100 100 104 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 89
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 99.7
92% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback