Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 08:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 164
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 247
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 286
19% 286 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 71%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 53 47 54 64 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 385
Write 156
Mixed 139
SusWrite 55.9
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 19.9
69% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 83.5
78% 122 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 0.5
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 14,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $457
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback