Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '19 at 03:21
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 182 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 337 46% 342 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8596) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 111 Parallax 92.4 81% 101 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 93.2 Splatting 96.9 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 858GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 204 210 211 210 210 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.1% Above average	Read 215 Write 208 Mixed 201 SusWrite 207 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 29.9 100% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 47.2 40% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 199GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 205 211 211 210 210 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.4% Above average	Read 222 Write 210 Mixed 196 SusWrite 208 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 32.7 106% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 36.3 DQ Write 84.9 DQ Mixed 47.6 40% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 152 153 153 154 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 134 Write 102 Mixed 61 SusWrite 152 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 458GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 118 121 120 120 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 69.2 Write 68.7 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 119 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 455GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 9.8 10 9.9 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 9.9 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 74%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 778GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 22.3 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 10 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 21%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 474GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.5% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 23.5 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 9.9 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 15%
ASMT 2115 2TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 712GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 10 9.9 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 10 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 118% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLH-8G 16GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	34x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	32x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	5x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	4x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16