Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G3258-$80
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
SC Int 115
SC Float 117
SC Mixed 115
92% 116 Pts
QC Int 226
QC Float 228
QC Mixed 220
51% 224 Pts
MC Int 228
MC Float 225
MC Mixed 225
34% 226 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 101 100 97 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 58
SusWrite 102
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 78%
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.7
8% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4GBH1X04E99927-15 0118 64C0MHHHJ-HS 8GB
1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $291
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback