| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180620 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 27 '19 at 18:41 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
98.4%
Outstanding
|
97% 175 Pts
|
86% 695 Pts
|
51% 828 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 200 189 192 194 170 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
64% 285 MB/s
|
153% 55.9 MB/s
|
170% 253 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HX424C15FB/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.6%
Average
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
65% 61.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,817 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 642x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 139x |
| Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples | 138x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 165x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 113x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $529 |