Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 84.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 880 80% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,298 80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 84.9 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 152 69% 109 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 114 Splatting 129 93% 111 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,009 Write 1,549 Mixed 729 315% 1,429 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 200 4K Mixed 74.3 271% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,202 DQ Write 1,203 DQ Mixed 849 735% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 17GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 170 170 183 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 332 Write 260 Mixed 253 SusWrite 174 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 41.5 146% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 48.6 86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 20GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 145 178 181 175 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 328 Write 257 Mixed 250 SusWrite 168 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 39 139% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 192 155% 217 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 85%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 890GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 105 104 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 107 Write 99.3 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 104 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 62%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 193 190 196 195 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 146 146 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 162 Write 146 Mixed 95.6 SusWrite 145 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 145GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 77 76 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 97.4 Write 67.8 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 75.8 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 85%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 207 213 208 206 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
ASMT 2105 250GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 152GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 181 178 153 149 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 284 Write 278 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 189 260% 203 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 28.9 2,627% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 60.4 DQ Mixed 32.7 3,253% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 225%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,820 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 39.5 118% 41.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 43.7 SC Mixed 34.3 99% 34.7 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)