Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '19 at 00:08
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 196 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 306 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 63.9 59% 70 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 67 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 113 117 113 111 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 471 Mixed 390 SusWrite 156 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 51.4 171% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 349 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 41GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 126 118 129 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 162 Write 129 Mixed 81 SusWrite 132 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA MK5076GSX 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 414GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 70 Write 68.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 71.6 84% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.4% Very good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 22.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,503x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,315x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,119x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,345x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,038x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	738x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	582x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	522x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,073

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16