Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	7.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '19 at 20:25
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 254 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 824 81% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,351 84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% XFX(1682 2393) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 4.59 8% 7.74 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 6.13 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 9%
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 C866) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Lighting 5.93 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 1.81 5% 5.51 fps	MRender 8.95 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 6.13 5% 6.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 725 606 600 607 608 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 2,573 Write 2,152 Mixed 1,456 SusWrite 873 393% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 86.6 293% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 930 DQ Mixed 961 725% 971 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 103GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,670 Write 3,755 Mixed 3,927 986% 4,451 MB/s	4K Read 568 4K Write 264 4K Mixed 329 1,422% 387 MB/s	DQ Read 1,485 DQ Write 1,007 DQ Mixed 1,010 818% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 155GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 317 316 316 315 316 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 455 Mixed 411 SusWrite 333 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.5 205% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 274 208% 278 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 130GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 311 307 305 306 309 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 475 Mixed 400 SusWrite 326 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.4 205% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 365 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 565GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 79 79 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 92.5 Write 97.7 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 79.1 64% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 212GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 94.2 Write 89 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 88.5 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 645GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 68 70 69 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	47% Average	Read 95 Write 86.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 68.2 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 619GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 96 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 98.5 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 57GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 23 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 134 Write 30.2 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 27.4 64% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 72% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 39%
Ativa My 2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 5554 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.7 8.9 8.1 8.9 8.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.2% Terrible	Read 34.7 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 8.4 13% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 37% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.2% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 45.2 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 34 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.7 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 29.8 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,435x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)