Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 956
85% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 61.6
52% 65 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 59.2
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD T00 StoreMI 238GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 405 450 405 473 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 471
Mixed 350
SusWrite 439
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 36.3
133% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 268
217% 307 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 91%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
256GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 58 68 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 68
Write 67.4
Mixed 52
SusWrite 64.5
85% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 29%
Great: 39%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 16 0 24 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 36.1
126% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 73%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-75GXCB0 4TB
574GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 89
SusWrite 0.1
93% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 64%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
568GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 74 68 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 85
SusWrite 67.4
120% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback