| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120329 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '19 at 18:19 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
|
44.8%
Average
|
36% 45.4 Pts
|
6% 46 Pts
|
3% 47.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.61%
Terrible
|
2% 1.82 fps
|
2% 2.14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 187 189 192 205 192 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
46% 203 MB/s
|
76% 26.6 MB/s
|
110% 161 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
48GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.7 9.9 11 11 10 MB/s
|
4.13%
Terrible
|
5% 6.22 MB/s
|
13% 0.07 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 12 11 11 11 MB/s
|
4.59%
Terrible
|
13% 9.75 MB/s
|
11% 0.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
25.4%
Poor
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
18% 6.23 GB/s
|
53% 76 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 64x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 162x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 69x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |