Gigabyte GA-X79S-UP5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79S-UP5  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131218
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 484
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 191
Parallax 191
140% 184 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 182
Splatting 123
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9261-8i 478GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 155 78 119 103 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
13GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,519
Write 1,735
Mixed 734
365% 1,663 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 43.8
155% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 542
423% 586 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Intenso SSD 240GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 283
Mixed 281
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 1.7
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 1.8
43% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
169GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 93 95 99 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 50.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 95.1
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 198%
Samsung SP0812C 80GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 46 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 38
Write 42
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 46.8
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 32%
Intenso Rainbow Line 4GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.4 7.2 6.5 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Read 5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 6.6
6% 4.28 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 6%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
4GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 4.9
8% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ16GX3M4A16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 33.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79S-UP5 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79S-UP5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback