Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190228
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 74.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 852 82% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,312 81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 179 Parallax 153 128% 163 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 166 Splatting 118 108% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1052 Write 1,371 Mixed 969 254% 1,131 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 67.3 223% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 53.9 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 72.1 60% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 16GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 494 Write 340 Mixed 353 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 45.6 155% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 94.8 87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
AMD T00 StoreMI 4TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 194GB free Firmware: 1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 104 162 166 163 150 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 139 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 143 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 216% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M23200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 26.2 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 19.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16