Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 132 2-Core 226 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 440 44% 359 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB 7,253 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 620 629 668 681 668 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,006 Write 1,244 Mixed 717 SusWrite 651 204% 904 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 67.4 230% 84.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 786 DQ Mixed 750 602% 850 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 204%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI26D4S9D8ME-16 1x16GB 2,405 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 12.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	125x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	18x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	97x
GeForce GTX 1050 With Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 22%, 347 samples	24x
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 26%, 1,098 samples	22x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 8,131 samples	43x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 167%, 7,253 samples	30x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples	21x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	45x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	12x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16