| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170524 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '19 at 10:07 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
73% 122 Pts
|
32% 249 Pts
|
15% 245 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
|
30.7%
Below average
|
31% 35.1 fps
|
30% 36.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 59 58 61 62 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
29% 134 MB/s
|
47% 13.3 MB/s
|
40% 66.4 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 193 211 220 210 200 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
105% 145 MB/s
|
138% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUM4U-8G2400P16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.5%
Good
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
58% 68.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,421 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 264x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 255x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 172x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 219x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 146x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 107x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $273 |