Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 71 2-Core 124 60% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 185 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 144 149 143 149 148 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 167 Write 168 Mixed 156 SusWrite 148 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 27.7 93% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 30 27% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 7 6.8 6.8 7.4 7.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 11.6 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 6.5 17% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.7% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $338

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16