| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180507 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '19 at 04:01 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 85% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.3%
Very good
|
76% 131 Pts
|
52% 390 Pts
|
24% 390 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.4%
Poor
|
3% 46.1 fps
|
60% 73.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 6.8 6.7 12 104 74 MB/s
|
28.5%
Poor
|
27% 125 MB/s
|
45% 14.7 MB/s
|
11% 14.9 MB/s
|
|
|
63% 84.7 MB/s
|
206% 1.53 MB/s
| ||
|
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
931GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 39 40 41 41 MB/s
|
20.6%
Poor
|
51% 37.8 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
68.8%
Good
|
69% 24.3 GB/s
|
58% 20.5 GB/s
|
59% 67.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |