| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus G11CD-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK G11CD-K |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171116 |
| Uptime | 2.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '19 at 19:58 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.2%
Very good
|
73% 128 Pts
|
49% 366 Pts
|
21% 345 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.9%
Above average
|
52% 60.8 fps
|
52% 63.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 175 176 173 170 MB/s
|
51.7%
Above average
|
43% 192 MB/s
|
74% 28.1 MB/s
|
84% 138 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
638GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 153 157 163 165 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
88% 121 MB/s
|
95% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57.6%
Above average
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
53% 75.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,725 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus G11CD-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 905x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 724x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 450x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 296x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 235x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $211 |