| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170824 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '19 at 12:34 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.6%
Very good
|
77% 134 Pts
|
54% 400 Pts
|
25% 400 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
|
28.7%
Poor
|
34% 37.6 fps
|
19% 26.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
126% 1.1 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
65.7%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
59% 67.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,918 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,115x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 639x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 554x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 841x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 469x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 367x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |