Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion dv2000 (GJ175PA#ACJ) (all builds)
Motherboard	Wistron 30B2
Memory	1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '19 at 12:21
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2080-$150 496 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 54.6 1-Core 17 2-Core 33 26% 34.9 Pts	4-Core 29.8 8-Core 30.5 4% 30.1 Pts	64-Core 33.9 2% 33.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SB4OC7BP SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 22 25 24 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 22.9 10% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 25%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 3,832 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 22GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 6.1 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 13.2 24% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.1 142% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.93% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16