| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180507 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 24 '19 at 12:12 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.6%
Good
|
79% 140 Pts
|
42% 316 Pts
|
20% 318 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.3
|
30.9%
Below average
|
32% 40.3 fps
|
29% 35.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
70% 318 MB/s
|
74% 25.6 MB/s
|
153% 226 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 70 74 97 72 44 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
62% 84.4 MB/s
|
143% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
851GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 130 123 131 128 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
139% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
74%
Very good
|
75% 26.3 GB/s
|
64% 22.6 GB/s
|
53% 75.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,069 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 314x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 144x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 123x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $542 |