Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming GT  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 16:35
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 400
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.78
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 291 294 294 293 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 611
Write 304
Mixed 291
SusWrite 293
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 24.1
165% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 407
359% 558 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 101 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 88.1
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 101
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 186 186 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 180
Mixed 108
SusWrite 186
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 82.1
Write 83
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 82.4
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 46%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 157 157 156 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 132
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 155
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE604 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: LHGNW384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 176 165 171 183 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 195
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 168
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
264% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 30.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming GT Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $716
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback