Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 97 2-Core 176 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 418 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.1 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.6% Below average	Lighting 46.1 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 58.3 38% 45 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 38.2 32% 38.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 245 237 245 236 239 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 322 Write 311 Mixed 296 SusWrite 239 66% 292 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 38.5 126% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 222 170% 232 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 211 198 202 194 199 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 321 Write 236 Mixed 269 SusWrite 200 58% 256 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 33.3 108% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 124 117% 183 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 116%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 144 173 171 163 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 177 Mixed 32 SusWrite 164 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 613GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 102 119 116 111 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 138 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 113 77% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 5.7 3.6 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 2.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.8 8% 7.02 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C9 2x4GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.7% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	396x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $722

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16