Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 757 77% 623 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C2) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 124 Parallax 136 104% 129 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 124 Splatting 102 107% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 212 202 195 191 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 374 Write 359 Mixed 328 SusWrite 206 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 52 172% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 220 165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 124%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 244GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 74 77 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 69.3 Write 63.5 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 76.3 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 49%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 644GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 97 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 56.5 Write 51.2 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 97 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 67%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 870GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 123 125 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 74.7 Write 73.3 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 123 59% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 96%
WD My Book 1230 2TB 4,878 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 482GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 115 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 146 Write 143 Mixed 85 SusWrite 114 162% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.8 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 35.1 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 26.6 SC Write 41 SC Mixed 29.2 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)