Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 800G5M/800G5W  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT800G5M-X79L
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181113
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 172
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 244
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Sanyo(144D C790) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4735
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 5.38
5% 12 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 0.09
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 165 153 167 168 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 741
Mixed 467
SusWrite 183
130% 584 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.6
204% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 845
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 705
552% 761 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 147%
Great: 208%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
338GB free
Firmware: AM003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 111 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 105
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 109
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4.8 7.2 6 6 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 5.8
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
65% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 15.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 800G5M/800G5W Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback