| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171121 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '19 at 04:38 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.2%
Very good
|
71% 128 Pts
|
67% 545 Pts
|
51% 819 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
103%
Outstanding
|
104% 127 fps
|
104% 132 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 391 397 421 407 406 MB/s
|
93.5%
Outstanding
|
95% 422 MB/s
|
131% 50.7 MB/s
|
83% 169 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 111 106 77 99 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
71% 96.4 MB/s
|
201% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
812GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 168 174 177 170 176 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
117% 159 MB/s
|
233% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2800 C16 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.6%
Very good
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
66% 22.9 GB/s
|
40% 98.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 179 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $258 |