Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 128 53% 89 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 164 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0440) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 0.56 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 117 101 102 92 103 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.1% Above average	Read 218 Write 208 Mixed 186 SusWrite 122 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 26.1 86% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 140 116% 167 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD80 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	868x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	324x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	52x

SSD
PC SN530 WDC 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 2,021 samples	98x
SN530 NVMe WDC 256GBPCBench 145%, 4,455 samples	50x
KBG40ZNS512G KIOXIA 512GBNvmeBench 158%, 4,729 samples	48x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GBUnknownBench 32%, 13,137 samples	245x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	95x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 7,899 samples	51x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16