Lenovo 10NM003TCR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10NM003TCR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 22:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 425
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 6.59
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6.03
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 116 152 169 163 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 154
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 149
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback