PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 16 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140325 |
Uptime | 18.8 Days |
Run Date | Mar 22 '19 at 21:38 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.0NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 36 64 67 75 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
141GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 24 25 23 23 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,499x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 772x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 686x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 495x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 304x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |