Fujitsu D1675

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu D1675  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D1675
Memory1.1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 37.2
26% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 26.5
8-Core 37.3
4% 31.9 Pts
64-Core 37.4
2% 37.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200
PNY(196E 02F3) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 30 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 27.9
23% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback