Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-8600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.9% Poor
SC Int 25.5
SC Float 30.4
SC Mixed 43.1
26% 33 Pts
QC Int 119
QC Float 140
QC Mixed 129
29% 129 Pts
MC Int 93.8
MC Float 90.6
MC Mixed 63.3
12% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$208
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.9% Good
Lighting 158
Reflection 199
Parallax 236
58% 198 fps
MRender 153
Gravity 210
Splatting 166
75% 176 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 312 312 312 308 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 473
Write 312
Mixed 307
SusWrite 304
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 30.7
117% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 30.4
66% 133 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 127%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$105
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 185 184 188 187 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 23.3
Write 138
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 185
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000VN008-2DR166 2TB
807GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.3
Write 69.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 39.4
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
984GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 106 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 105
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 97%
SAMSUNG HD321KJ 320GB
72GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 36
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 36.2
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$133
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 14.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 7,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,533
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $99
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $651SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback