Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 06:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 196
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 652
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 66.2
62% 72.9 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 72.4
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1285 321 284 284 287 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,222
Write 1,460
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 459
294% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 68.3
225% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 918
666% 868 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 225%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
886GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 390 403 448 454 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 452
Mixed 391
SusWrite 423
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 40.1
146% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 123
95% 133 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 121%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 122 119 121 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 120
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 86%
Kingmax Flash Disk 64GB
7GB free, PID 0903
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39.3
Write 38.9
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 40.2
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 26.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback