Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 23:24
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 982
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 2,685
166% 2,685 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,484
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 229
Parallax 257
137% 218 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 237
Splatting 149
174% 222 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 140%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 451 452 454 452 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 446
Mixed 429
SusWrite 450
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 50
164% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 250
194% 265 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
264GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 483 482 485 484 485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 486
Mixed 418
SusWrite 483
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.4
194% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
672GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 88.3
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
837GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 185 184 184 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 174
Mixed 118
SusWrite 184
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
629GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 97 98 96 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 97.4
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
649GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 86 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 91.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 88.2
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 71.1
MC Write 72.9
MC Mixed 67.9
202% 70.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 177%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $874
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback