Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-6100-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 115
54% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 275
31% 240 Pts
64-Core 264
18% 264 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 62.3
17% 56.3 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 69
Splatting 40.1
19% 54.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 104 110 109 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 324
Write 110
Mixed 108
SusWrite 103
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 17.9
84% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 45.8
65% 123 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
Crucial BX300 480GB-$150
52GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 197 192 194 193 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 345
Write 302
Mixed 297
SusWrite 187
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 33.4
113% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 221
168% 226 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$75
68GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 168 161 171 164 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 241
Write 220
Mixed 218
SusWrite 160
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 36.7
120% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 145
109% 145 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 123%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
119GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 236
Write 206
Mixed 188
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 20.3
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 103
78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $296
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback