Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '19 at 19:41
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 218 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 662 65% 532 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1814 2088 2113 2143 2116 2174 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	342% Outstanding	Read 2,336 Write 2,131 Mixed 1,335 SusWrite 2,074 442% 1,969 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 68.3 239% 89.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,157 DQ Write 988 DQ Mixed 1,030 784% 1,058 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 342% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 476GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 464 454 466 456 456 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 458 Mixed 418 SusWrite 456 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 50.4 186% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 341 258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 307 307 306 307 306 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 414 Mixed 376 SusWrite 322 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 55 197% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 345 261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD2 0443 RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD2 0443 RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.9% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22.3 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 19.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF - $120

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	367x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	251x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	141x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	130x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	98x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	61x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	68x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $629

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16