Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 13:46
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 123
50% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 253
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 64.6
60% 70.3 fps
MRender 75.6
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 62
55% 68.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 108 72 91 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 274
Write 113
Mixed 160
SusWrite 85
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 24.1
96% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 81
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 75.3
63% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 75%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
110GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 63
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 60.9
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 56 104 112 109 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Write 101
SusWrite 100
130% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback