Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640 538 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 111 53% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 357 33% 278 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 48 50 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 128 Write 50.6 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 48.7 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 163% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 119%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 13.7 29% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 62% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 18 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56451stBench 59%, 1,766 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x

SSD
GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TBGigabyteBench 201%, 8,556 samples	1x

RAM
6x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 680 samples	2x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	1x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16