Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '19 at 03:51
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$101 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 244 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 592 66% 522 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2063) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.1% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 112 Parallax 107 96% 112 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 96.1 Splatting 80.1 82% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 102 89 102 115 114 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 222 Write 226 Mixed 248 SusWrite 111 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 11.3 69% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 26.5 45% 87.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 703GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 114 117 118 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 70.5 Write 70.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 122 54% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 109%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 62GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 29.7 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 41.7 49% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $528

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16